Groups Takes Stand Against Deceptive Food Labeling Initiative

By CnAgri2012-08-17 19:46:07 Print

Proposition 37 is a ballot initiative Californians will vote on in November that would require a warning label on food products that include a genetically modified ingredient. Food companies routinely use corn, soy or canola ingredients in their products, and have had the choice and used GM ingredients for a long time. The safety and benefits of these ingredients are well established. The debate will be heating up in advance of the November vote in California, so we want to be clear about taking a stand against Proposition 37.

Consumers have broad food choices today, but could be denied these choices if Prop 37 prevails. Accordingly, the American Soybean Association is supporting NO on 37: Coalition Against the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme, a coalition of California farmers, food producers, grocers and retailers formed to oppose Proposition 37. The NO on 37 coalition includes stakeholders involved in producing, manufacturing and selling food products. Interestingly, the main proponents of Proposition 37 are special interest groups and individuals opposed to food biotechnology who are not necessarily engaged in the production of our nation抯 food supply. They are gearing up a campaign of misinformation.

Opinion surveys consistently report that consumers support FDA's current labeling policy - mandatory labeling for important nutrition or safety information. Food companies can and do provide additional information voluntarily to meet the preferences of their customers. Hundreds of organic or certified non-GM products are available for consumers who prefer these products. This approach offers choices for all consumers and does so without the risk of confusing consumers who are satisfied with the products they know, trust and can afford.

Leading proponents of Proposition 37 claim that foods containing GM ingredients as untested and unsafe.