Study Suggests Canada's Beef Industry at a Tipping Point

By CnAgri2012-09-12 19:12:24 Print

A new study released by CAPI, the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute, indicates that Canada's beef industry is at a profound tipping point and corrective action is needed if it is going to deliver maximum benefits to producers and industry stakeholders and deliver on its potential of being a reliable contributor to a protein hungry world.

"Canada's beef industry is falling behind and opportunities are being eroded by a failure to work together," says CAPI President and CEO, David McInnes. "The data and interviews show our beef industry lacks a comprehensive strategy to address challenges and take advantages of the significant opportunities that the future offers."

The study shows that Canada with all its natural, quality and production benefits is at risk of becoming a net importer of beef. The cattle cycle is presently experiencing lower production numbers but there is also no apparent strategy to regain valuable domestic market share.

On the export stage, the Canadian industry is extremely reliant on one market - the US, a market that accounts for 85% of Canada's beef and cattle trade. The good news is the US generates $1.8 billion in total sales for Canada (nearly $1 billion in beef exports and over $800 million in cattle exports). The bad news is Canada is "backfilling" the US market; that is, by relying on Canadian cattle and beef supply, the US beef industry is expanding its exports and taking advantage of higher value and margins. And the Canadian industry appears to be content to let that happen.

But don't blame the government, the study says. When beef producers and the beef industry needed support, like after the BSE crisis, the federal and provincial governments have been there. And the Government of Canada is doing an admirable job of opening new foreign markets yet the beef industry is not doing enough to capture new sales, enhanced prices and greater margins. Ultimately, industry must develop its strategy. Governments can then support genuine strategy development and effectively align its investments behind the priorities.

"There now appears to be a growing appetite in the beef sector to embrace a new approach," says McInnes. "There is an emerging view that we can't optimize the domestic, American and other foreign markets at the rate we are shipping cattle and beef to the US. We either accept that we will remain a primary 'backfill' supplier of beef and cattle to the US - with its consequences and benefits - or we need to make a conscious strategic decision about the markets where we can perform at our best. This includes increasing the share of Canadian-beef in our own domestic market, taking fuller advantage of key high value foreign markets where we have or can develop competitive advantage, and deciding how we can better extract more value from the important US market."

The study also outlines that response to consumer desires is below expectations. Today's consumers want more information including greater knowledge of production practices, the healthfulness of beef and its environmental footprint. Yet the Canadian beef industry is not effectively conveying messages that address issues and concerns or encourage beef consumption.

CAPI interviewed over 80 beef sector stakeholders and a broad variety of support players in the fall of 2011 and conducted extensive outreach in 2012. CAPI initiated this case study with financial support from the Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency (ALMA), the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) and the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture.