California Voters Reject Prop 37 GM Food Labeling Proposal

By CnAgri Print

A Californian ballot proposing the labeling of genetically modified ingredients in food products has been rejected by the state's voters.

With 95% of votes counted, the polls showed 47% voted in favor and 53% against. The contentious measure, proposition 37, would have required GM labels on food sold in supermarkets, and was seen as a testbed case for the U.S. as a whole.

Monsanto and other agribusiness and food companies such as PepsiCo and Nestle spent $45 million on advertising and lobbying for the "no" campaign, compared with around $8 million for the "yes" campaign, that was largely funded by organic food companies.

Before the vote, the prop 37 supporter Andrew Kimbrell had said he hoped it would be the "hammer we needed to break open the federal roadblock". But those hopes have been dashed with 23,221 of 24,491 precincts in the state reporting votes.

Grant Lundberg, CEO of Lundberg Family Farms, co-chair of the Yes on 37 group, told the San Franciso Chronicle: "Whatever happens tonight, this is a win. Never before have millions of Californians come together to support giving consumers a choice about genetically engineered foods." The yes campaign had attracted several celebrity supporters, such as Gwyneth Paltrow and rap star Pharrell Williams who tweeted on Tuesday night: "vote yes on Prop 37 if you believe you have the right to know what's in your food."

Supporters had argued consumers have the "right to know" if GM products are in their food, but corporate opponents said the labels would lead to price rises. The American Association for the Advancement of Science, which opposed the proposition, has said: "These efforts [to label] are not driven by evidence that GM foods are actually dangerous. Indeed, the science is quite clear: crop improvement by the modern molecular techniques of biotechnology is safe."