Along with Corn Planting Margins Less than Soybean in Heilongjiang, More Soybean Would be Planted Instead of Corn in 201


According to BOABC’s investigation, whether in self-owned land or rented land, soybean planting margins all were higher than corn planting margins in Heilongjiang in 2016.
(1) Corn output value was almost the same as soybean in Heilongjiang. According to investigation, 2016 soybean output value recorded at RMB 570/mu; however, due to a drop in purchase price, corn output value of most farmers decreased to RMB 615/mu, only RMB 45/mu higher than soybean. (2) Corn planting costs in Heilongjiang were far higher than soybean. Due to high material inputs such as fertilizer, pesticide, agricultural film and machinery, as well as labor costs, corn production costs were RMB 300/mu higher than soybean. (3) There were no big differences between the subsidies for soybean and corn planting in Heilongjiang. So, for self-owned land, soybean planting margins were RMB 231/mu higher than corn; for rented land, corn planting saw the loss of RMB 240/mu, however, soybean planting saw profit and loss balance. Besides, if it is listed in the pilot of soybean rotation instead of corn, the extra subsidies of RMB 150/mu will be gained.
Influenced by planting margins, 2017 soybean planting areas would increase, but corn planting areas would reduce, and substitution planting would focus on traditional soybean planting areas such as the fourth and fifth accumulated temperature zones of Heilongjiang.
Table 1, Planting Costs & Benefits of Soybean and Corn in Heilongjiang in 2016
Unit: Kg/mu, RMB/kg, RMB/mu
Soybean | Corn | ||||
Self-Owned Land | Rented Land | Self-Owned Land | Rented Land | ||
Total Output Value | 570 | 570 | 615 | 615 | |
Average Output | 150 | 150 | 473 | 473 | |
Selling Price | 3.8 | 3.8 | 1.30 | 1.30 | |
Total Cost | 400 | 750 | 700 | 1080 | |
Production Cost | 400 | 400 | 700 | 700 | |
Service & Material Cost | 200 | 200 | 350 | 350 | |
Labor Cost | 200 | 200 | 350 | 350 | |
Land Cost | 0 | 350 | 0 | 380 | |
Producer Subsidy | 130 | 130 | 154 | 154 | |
Three Subsidies (Direct Subsidy, Capital Subsidy, Seed Subsidy) | 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | |
Net Benefit | 371 | 21 | 140 | -240 |
Data source: investigation data from BOABC.
Recommended Reports »
- Investment Research Report on China Fruit Juices & Drinks Market
- Import and export Special Report
- Analysis and Forecast on China Juice Industry (2016-2017)
- Analysis and Forecast on China Sugar Industry (2016-2017)
- China Fruits and Vegetables Market Report
- Soft Drink
- Analysis and Forecast on China’s Dairy Industry (2016/2017)
- Century Dairy
- China Fertilizer Investment Research Quarterly Report
- Market Size, Competition Pattern and Future Development Forecast of China Animal Vaccine Market
Most Popular »
- Top 20 Soybean Importers in December, 2012
- World Peanut Production in 2012
- Shuangbaotai Group Cuts Feed Price
- Urea Price Decreased and...
- Analysis of monthly imports...
- Retail Prices of Liquid Milk in May
- Video Conference on Rural ...
- Benzoic Acid Exports By Month
- Canada to grant continued ...
- China’s consumption of pou...
- Spot Price Index and Processing Profit
- China Grain Reserves Corpor...
- Top 10 Chinese Log Importe...